Russell v. Castle et al

6:24-cv-06140Arwd06.05.2025

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
LAWRENCE J. RUSSELL 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 6:24-cv-06140
CODY CASTLE; ZACHARY
DILLIARD; COOK; OFFICER
BROWN; and H STRAHAN 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed March 26, 2025, by the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(ECF No. 15). Judge Ford recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) be dismissed
without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.
Plaintiff has not responded and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Ford’s reasoning is
sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) in toto. Accordingly,
the Court finds that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 3) should be and hereby is
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with
court orders.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 6th day of May, 2025.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Case 6:24-cv-06140-SOH Document 16 Filed 05/06/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.