USA v. Digiacomo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HOT SPRINGS DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 	PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
v. 	Case No. 6:23-cr-60017
ADAM DIGIACOMO 	DEFENDANT/MOVANT
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed November 24, 2025, by the
Honorable Spencer G. Singleton, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. 	(ECF No. 54). 	In his Report and Recommendation, Judge Singleton explains that
Judge Ford, to whom the motion was initially referred, found that Movant Adam Digiacomo’s
section 2255 motion was deficient because it was not on the standard form, did not contain a
statement of relief requested, and was not signed under penalty of perjury by Movant. (ECF No.
37). 	To date, Movant has not filed a new section 2255 motion or otherwise responded to the
Court’s order. Thus, Judge Singleton recommends that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or
Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 35) should be denied for failure to follow
a Court order and failure to prosecute.
Movant has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to object
has passed. 	See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 	Upon review, the Court adopts the Report and
Recommendation (ECF No. 54) in toto. 	Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct
Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 35) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 19th day of February, 2026.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
United States District Judge
Case 6:23-cr-60017-SOH Document 55 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>