Stewart v. Ridenoure

5:25-cv-05265Arwd02.03.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
JASYN L. STEWART 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	CASE NO. 5:25-CV-5265
CASSIE RIDENOURE 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) of the
Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds
that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED
IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike
for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g)
strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. In view of this Order, the Motion
for Subpoena (Doc. 9) is MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 2nd day of March, 2026.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-05265-TLB Document 10 Filed 03/02/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.