London Luxury LLC v. Walmart Inc.

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION
LONDON LUXURY, LLC 	PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT
V. 	CASE NO. 5:22-CV-5059
WALMART, INC. 	DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF
ORDER NUMBER NINE REGARDING WALMART’S PRIVILEGE LOG
Walmart’s counsel sent an email to the Court and opposing counsel at 1:27 a.m.
today, April 1, 2024, advising that “Walmart ran additional checks . . . to confirm that all
of the recent productions and in camera submissions were exhaustive.”1 After running
these checks, Walmart identified additional documents “that were intended to have
already been submitted to the Court for in camera review, consistent with the Privilege
Orders, but were not.” At 11:29 a.m., Walmart produced these documents to chambers
for in camera review.
The Court has now reviewed all documents that were submitted today by Walmart.
Given the Court’s privilege log rulings to date, the Court finds that the following Bates-
numbered documents were unnecessarily redacted or withheld as privileged:
• 	97298
• 	97325
• 	97345
• 	97658–97667
• 	99054–99058
• 	99386–99405
1 Walmart’s email is attached as an exhibit to this Order.
Case 5:22-cv-05059-TLB Document 442 Filed 04/01/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
• 	99406–99426
• 	99488–99496
• 	99497–99499
• 	99509–99517
• 	100402–100432
IT 	IS 	THEREFORE 	ORDERED 	that 	Walmart 	immediately 	produce 	these
documents to London Luxury. 	The remainder of the documents submitted for today’s
inspection are deemed to have been permissibly withheld or redacted.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 1st day of April, 2024.
______________________________
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:22-cv-05059-TLB Document 442 Filed 04/01/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>