5:22-cr-50061•USA v. Horton et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION RICHARD PATRICK HORTON PETITIONER V. CASE NO. 5:22-CR-50061 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RESPONDENT ORDER Comes on for consideration the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 141) filed in this case on January 27, 2026, by the Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No objections were filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case and finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 129), is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. His Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 138) and Motion for Copies (Doc. 140) are DENIED as MOOT. Further, any future request for a certificate of appealability will be denied for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED on this 18th day of February, 2026. /s/ Timothy L. Brooks TIMOTHY L. BROOKS CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:22-cr-50061-TLB Document 142 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.