Williams v. Gulick

4:20-cv-04079Arwd16.10.2024

Gesamter Gesetzestext

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
HARMON WILLIAMS 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 4:20-cv-04079
DETECTIVE REYN BROWN;
OFFICER DANIEL OLLER;
and STEPHEN GULICK 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed September 6, 2024, by the
Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
(ECF No. 95). 	Judge Bryant recommends that all claims asserted against Separate Defendant
Daniel Oller (“Separate Defendant Oller”) be dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff has not responded and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Bryant’s reasoning is
sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 95) in toto. 	Accordingly,
Separate Defendant Oller’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 71) is GRANTED and all
claims against Separate Defendant Oller should be and hereby are DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 16th day of October, 2024.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:20-cv-04079-SOH Document 97 Filed 10/16/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.