2:20-cr-20008•USA v. Hughes, et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT v. No. 2:20-cr-20008-2 BRENT PRESLEY DEFENDANT/MOVANT ORDER The Court has received a report and recommendation (Doc. 83) from Chief United States Magistrate Judge Mark E. Ford, recommending that Defendant Brent Presley’s motion (Doc. 78) to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 be denied and dismissed without prejudice because it is facially deficient. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed, and the deadline for objecting has passed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the report and recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Brent Presley’s motion (Doc. 78) to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue. IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of June, 2024. /s/P. K. Holmes , ΙΙΙ P.K. HOLMES, III U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:20-cr-20008-PKH Document 85 Filed 06/27/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.