USA v. Nguyen et al

2:03-cr-20039Arwd31.01.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT
V. Civil No. 05-2012
Criminal No. 03CR20039-003
SON TRUONG NGUYEN DEFENDANT/MOVANT
O R D E R
On this 31st day of January 2006, there comes on for
consideration the report and recommendation filed in this
case on January 13, 2006, by the Honorable Beverly Stites
Jones, United States Magistrate for the Western District of
Arkansas. (Doc. 170). Movant has filed written objections to
the report and recommendation. (Doc. 172).
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well
and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted
in its entirety. Accordingly, the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion
(Doc. 136) is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
Case 2:03-cr-20039-TLB Document 174 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.