1:26-cv-01015•Rakich v. Doe et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION DRAGO RAKICH PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 1:26-cv-1015 SHERIFF CHARLIE PHILLIPS; JUDGE BARKER; CAPTAIN J. SANDERS; JEFFEREY C. ROGERS; RANDEE MOLSBEE; and JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by the Honorable Christy D. Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 9. Upon pre-service screening of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), Judge Comstock recommends that: 1) Defendant Judge Barker be dismissed without prejudice because of judicial immunity, and; 2) Defendants Sheriff Charlie Phillips and Captain J. Sanders be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to state a claim against them. Judge Comstock further recommends that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Jefferey C. Rogers, Randee Molsbee, and John Doe be permitted to proceed. No party has objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Comstock’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 9) in toto. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Judge Barker, Sheriff Charlie Phillips, and Captain J. Sanders are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff’s claims against the remaining Defendants may proceed. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 15th day of June, 2026. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Senior United States District Judge Case 1:26-cv-01015-SOH-CDC Document 21 Filed 06/15/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.