USA v.Qiyama

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:24-cr-10004-SOH Document55 ~~ Filed 04/10/26 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS

EL DORADO DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
Vv. Case No. 1:24-CR-10004-001
INSHIQAQ QALAM QIYAMA II DEFENDANT
ORDER OF DETENTION

Having conducted a detention hearing on April 10, 2026, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal
Procedure 32.] (a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143, the Court, finds that Defendant’s request to be released
pending a revocation hearing is DENIED and ORDERS the above-named defendant detained
pending final revocation hearing in this matter.

A. Statement of Reasons for the Detention

The Court orders the defendant’s detention because it finds:

The defendant has not met defendant’s burden of establishing by clear and convincing
evidence that defendant is not likely to flee or appear as ordered;

The defendant has not met defendant’s burden of establishing by clear and convincing
evidence that defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person of
the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c);

I further find the Defendant is not likely to comply with any condition of release imposed
by the Court. The Court finds that there is probable cause to believe the Defendant has
committed additional criminal offenses while on Supervised Release and has a history of
failing drug screens. Further, the Court finds defendant likely left the district without
permission and recently fled from law enforcement.

The above findings are based on the reasons stated on the record at the conclusion of the
hearing in this matter.

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION 1
GPO

Case 1:24-cr-10004-SOH Document55 ~~ Filed 04/10/26 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #:
<pagelD>
B. “*4°-nal Dir--“ves
The further Court directs that:
The defendant be committed to the custody of the United States Marshal to be brought back
to Court for any hearing subsequently scheduled; and the defendant be afforded reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 10th day of Ay