4:25-cv-01135•Burns v. Does
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION DAVID BURNS, JR. PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 4:25-cv-01135-LPR-JJV DOES DEFENDANTS ORDER On October 30, 2025, Plaintiff Davis Burns, Jr. filed a one-page document that was docketed as a pro se Complaint seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On November 6, 2025, the Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to, within thirty (30) days, either pay the $405 filing fee or file a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis.2 The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with the Order would result in the dismissal of his lawsuit.3 Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a Notice seeking the removal of his warrants in state court.4 But he has not complied with the Court’s November 6, 2025 Order, and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) for failure to prosecute. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of December 2025. ________________________________ LEE P. RUDOFSKY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Compl. (Doc. 1). 2 Order (Doc. 3). The Order was entered by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. 3 Id. at 3. 4 Notice (Doc. 4). Case 4:25-cv-01135-LPR Document 5 Filed 12/11/25 Page 1 of 1
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.