Henry v. Watkins et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
JEREMY LEE HENRY 	PLAINTIFF
#307
v. 	Case No. 4:25-cv-01003-LPR-ERE
WATKINS, et al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received the Partial Recommended Disposition (PRD) submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin (Doc. 8). No objections have been filed, and the time for
doing so has expired. After a de novo review of the PRD, along with careful consideration of the
entire case record, the Court hereby approves and adopts the PRD as its findings and conclusions
in all respects.
Accordingly, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1. 	Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Chris Watkins and James Harrison are
DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a plausible constitutional claim for relief.
2. 	Plaintiff’s official capacity claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
state a plausible constitutional claim for relief.
3. 	The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Chris Watkins and James Harrison as parties
to this action.
4. 	The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 16th day of December 2025.
________________________________
LEE P. RUDOFSKY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-01003-LPR-ERE Document 15 Filed 12/16/25 Page 1 of 1