Woodward v. Does

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
ROBERT WOODWARD 	PLAINTIFF
ADC # 166447
v. 	Case No. 4:25-CV-00834-JM
DOES, et al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Robert Woodward (“Plaintiff”) has not responded to the Court’s October 31, 2025, Order
directing him to pay either the $405 filing and administrative fee or file a complete Motion for
Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, or by December 1, 2025. 	(Doc. No. 3).
The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to do one or the other would result in the dismissal of
his Complaint without prejudice. 	(Id.).
Rule 5.5(c)(2) of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Eastern and
Western Districts of Arkansas provides as follows:
It is the duty of any party not represented by counsel to promptly notify the Clerk
and the other parties to the proceedings of any change in his or her address, to
monitor the progress of the case and to prosecute or defend the action diligently . .
. . If any communication from the Court to a pro se plaintiff is not responded to
within thirty (30) days, the case may be dismissed without prejudice. . . .
Because Plaintiff has failed to respond, his Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice
for failure to prosecute. 	The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered
frivolous and not in good faith. 	28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of December, 2025.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-00834-JM Document 4 Filed 12/10/25 Page 1 of 1