Woodyard v. Baldwin County Sheriff's Department et al

Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DRAPER FRANK WOODYARD, )
)
Petitioner, )
)
vs. ) CIV. ACT. NO. 1:24-cv-210-TFM-N
)
BALDWIN COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
)
)
)
Respondent. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On January 13, 2025, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation which
recommends this petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be dismissed without prejudice as moot,
all pending motions be denied as moot, and a certificate of appealability be denied. See Doc. 23.
No objections were filed and the time frame has passed.
Accordingly, after due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant
to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, it is ORDERED that
the petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED
without prejudice as moot. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. Finally, the Court
determines that Petitioner is not entitled to a Certificate of Appealability and therefore, is not
entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.
The Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2025.
/s/Terry F. Moorer
TERRY F. MOORER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:24-cv-00210-TFM-N Doc# 24 Filed 02/04/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>