1:24-cv-00028•Lucy v. Securus Technologies et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM N. LUCY, AIS# 204880 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CIV. A. NO. 24-00028-KD-N ) SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection (doc. 11) is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without prepayment of fees is DENIED and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. DONE this 27th day of March 2024. s/ Kristi K. DuBose KRISTI K. DuBOSE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.