2:25-cv-00770•Carey v. Allah et al
Gesamter Gesetzestext
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DEMETRIUS ISAAC CAREY, Plaintiff, v. E. ALLAH, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:25-cv-00770-ACA-SGC ORDER Demetrius Isaac Carey filed a pro se complaint alleging violations of his civil rights. (Doc. 1). On August 13, 2026, the magistrate judge entered a report recommending the court dismiss without prejudice Mr. Carey’s Eighth Amendment medical claims against Defendant YesCare Medical Services under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 8). The magistrate judge further recommended that the court permit Mr. Carey’s other claims to proceed. (Id.). Although the magistrate judge advised Mr. Carey of his right to object and the consequences of failing to object (id. at 9–10), Mr. Carey has not objected. Mr. Carey’s failure to file specific objections waives any challenge to the proposed findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 11th Cir. R. 3- 1. The court therefore ADOPTS the report and ACCEPTS the recommendation. FILED 2026 Oct-13 PM 04:39 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA Case 2:25-cv-00770-ACA-SGC Document 10 Filed 10/13/26 Page 1 of 2
2 Consistent with that recommendation, the court DISMISSES Mr. Carey’s Eighth Amendment medical claims against YesCare Medical Services WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The court REFERS Mr. Carey’s remaining claims to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. DONE and ORDERED this October 13, 2026. _________________________________ ANNEMARIE CARNEY AXON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-00770-ACA-SGC Document 10 Filed 10/13/26 Page 2 of 2
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.