CourtListener 10872066•Sean P. Ross v. Arch McGarity, Senior Judge
Sean P. Ross v. Arch McGarity, Senior Judge
CourtListener 10872066Gactapp08.06.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
June 08, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26O0021. SEAN P. ROSS v. ARCH MCGARITY, SENIOR JUDGE.
Sean P. Ross filed this original mandamus petition, seeking an order compelling
Senior Judge Arch McGarity to stay a contempt proceeding and to refrain from
exercising jurisdiction over the underlying property dispute case. Ross has not,
however, shown that this is one of the rare cases in which this Court will exercise its
limited original mandamus jurisdiction.
“Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to
issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo
warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such
relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v.
Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983); see also Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI,
Sec. I, Par. IV. As the Supreme Court of Georgia recently made clear, an appellate
court’s [constitutional] authority to issue such writs “is connected only to such
powers as necessary in aid of its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments.
[That authority] does not grant jurisdiction to [the appellate court] to issue process
as an original matter wholly unconnected to its appellate jurisdiction.” Arnold v.
Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 334(1) (914 SE2d 311) (2025) (punctuation omitted). Thus,
except in the rarest of cases, the procedure to be followed before seeking to invoke this
Court’s original mandamus jurisdiction is to file the petition in the appropriate lower
court first. Graham v. Cavender, 252 Ga. 123, 123 (311 SE2d 832) (1984); Expedia, Inc.
v. City of Columbus, 305 Ga. App. 450, 455(2)(b) (699 SE2d 600) (2010).
Here, Ross does not allege that he attempted to file a mandamus petition in the
superior court. Because it does not appear that Ross attempted to comply with the
requisite procedure for obtaining mandamus relief, this is not one of the extremely
rare cases in which this Court will exercise original jurisdiction. Accordingly, this
petition is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
06/08/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.