Florida Public Service Commission native order document 03133-2026

Order No. PSC-2026-0170-CFO-EIFlapubserv

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FILED 5/27/2026
DOCUMENT NO. 03133-2026
FPSC 	- COMMISSION CLERK
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
In re: Petition for determination of need for
Andytown-Oasis transmission lines project in
Broward and Miami-Dade Counties, by Florida
Power & Light Company._
DOCKET NO. 20260020- EI
ORDER NO. PSC-2026-0170-CFO-EI
ISSUED: May 27, 2026
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY’S
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL CLASSIFICATION
(DOCUMENT NO, 01692-2026)
On 	March 	20, 	2026, 	Florida 	Power & 	Light Company 	(FPL) 	filed 	a 	Request 	for
Confidential 	Classification of Information 	Contained 	in 	Its Responses 	to 	Staffs 	First 	Set of
Interrogatories, 	Nos. 	2, 	8, 	and 	15, 	and 	First 	Request 	for 	Production 	of Documents, No. 	1
(Request) 	pursuant 	to 	Section 	366.093, 	Florida 	Statutes 	(F.S.), and Rule 	25-22.006, 	Florida
Administrative Code 	(F.A.C.). The information in Document No. 01692-2026 can be 	identified
and described as follows:
(1) 	FPL’s response 	to Staffs 	First Set of Interrogatories (ROGs) Nos. 	8 and 	15, which
have system impact data for certain scenarios;
(2) 	The 	attachment 	to 	FPL’s 	response 	to ROG 	No. 	2, 	which 	has 	the 	results 	of
contingency analyses conducted by FPL; and
(3) 	FPL’s response to Staffs First Request for Production of Documents (PODs) No. 	1,
which 	is workpapers and contains documents 	identical 	to those 	in Document No.
01501-2026 (such as Attachment 7 and Exhibit MAY-4).
Request for Confidential Classification
FPL 	contends 	that 	the 	information 	contained 	in 	Exhibit A 	of the 	Request 	constitutes
proprietary and confidential business information 	entitled 	to protection under Section 366.093,
F.S., and Rule 25-22.006, F.A.C. FPL argues 	that 	this information relates 	to 	security measures,
systems, 	or procedures, 	the 	disclosure of which would adversely 	affect FPL and 	its customers.
Furthermore, FPL asserts that the information 	is intended to be and 	is treated by FPL as private
and 	has 	not been 	publicly 	disclosed. 	For 	these 	reasons, FPL 	argues 	that 	the 	information 	is
entitled to confidential classification pursuant to Section 366.093(3)(c), F.S.
Ruling
Section 	366.093(1), 	F.S., 	provides 	that 	records 	that 	the 	Florida 	Public 	Service
Commission (Commission) has found 	to contain proprietary business information 	shall be kept
confidential 	and 	shall 	be 	exempt 	from 	Chapter 	119, 	F.S. 	Section 	366.093(3), 	F.S., 	defines
“proprietary 	confidential 	business 	information” 	as 	information 	that 	is 	intended 	to be and 	is
ORDER NO. PSC-2026-0170-CFO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20260020-EI
PAGE 2
treated by the company as private, in that disclosure of the information would cause harm to the
company’s ratepayers or business operations, and has not been voluntarily disclosed to the
public. Section 366.093(3), F.S., provides that proprietary confidential business information
includes, but is not limited to:
(c) Security measures, systems, or procedures.
Upon review, it appears that portions of the above-referenced information in Document
No. 01692-2026, as specifically detailed in Exhibit A of the Request, satisfy the criteria set forth
in Section 366.093(3)(c), F.S., for classification as proprietary confidential business information.
Specifically, the information in FPL’s responses to ROGs Nos. 8 and 15 as described above
appears to constitute “security measures, systems, or procedures.” Thus, the information
identified 	in 	those 	subparts 	of 	Document 	No. 	01692-2026 	shall 	be 	granted 	confidential
classification.
In addition, the results of the contingency analyses contained in the attachment to FPL’s
response to ROG No. 2, which can be found in rows 4 through 8, also fall within the bounds of
proprietary confidential business information contemplated by Section 366.093(3)(c), F.S.
Release of this information could result in harm to FPL’s assets and thus its ability to serve
ratepayers. Therefore, confidentiality of Document No. 01692-2026 shall also be granted in
relation to rows 4 through 8 of the attachment to FPL’s response to ROG No. 2. However, it is
unclear how disclosure of the remaining information contained in this subpart would result in
harm to FPL’s assets and thus confidential classification of the remaining information is
unwarranted and shall not be granted.
Lastly, FPL’s response to POD No. 1, includes Attachment 7 and Exhibit MAY-4 (which
were both addressed elsewhere in my review of Document No. 01501-2026). Each of these
subparts contain some material that falls within the bounds of proprietary confidential business
information related to security measures, systems, or procedures. For Attachment 7, this includes
only rows 4 through 7 of the first table, the text contained in the first two rows of the space
between the tables, and rows 4 through 24 of the second table. For Exhibit MAY-4, this includes
the information in rows 3 through 8. Release of this information could result in harm to FPL’s
assets and thus its ability to serve ratepayers. Therefore, confidentiality of Document No. 01692-
2026 shall also be granted for FPL’s response to POD No. 1 in relation to the specific portions
just described. However, it is unclear how disclosure of the remaining information contained in
those subparts would result in harm to FPL’s assets and thus confidential classification of the
remaining information is unwarranted and shall not be granted. This is consistent with my
disposition of confidential material in Document No. 01501-2026, which features identical
documents.
Pursuant to Section 366.093(4), F.S., the information for which confidential classification
is granted herein shall remain protected from disclosure for a period of up to 18 months from the
date of issuance of this Order. At the conclusion of the 18-month period, the confidential
information will no longer be exempt from Section 119.07(1), F.S., unless FPL or another
ORDER NO. PSC-2026-0170-CFO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20260020-EI
PAGE 3
affected person shows, and the Commission finds, that the records continue to contain
proprietary confidential business information.
Pursuant to Rule 25-22.006(10), F.A.C., the material for which confidential classification
is denied shall remain protected from disclosure until the time for filing an appeal has expired.
FPL or another person may request continued confidential treatment until judicial review is
complete by filing such request in writing with the Office of Commission Clerk. The material
will thereafter receive confidential treatment through completion of judicial review.
Based on the foregoing, it is hereby
ORDERED by Commissioner Bobby Payne as Prehearing Officer, that Florida Power &
Light Company’s Request for Confidential Classification of Document No. 01692-2026 is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth herein. It is further
ORDERED that the information in Document No. 01692-2026 for which confidential
classification was granted shall remain protected from disclosure for a period of up to 18 months
from the date of issuance of this Order. It is further
ORDERED that the information in Document No. 01692-2026 for which confidential
classification was denied shall remain protected from disclosure until the time for filing an
appeal has expired. It is further
ORDERED that within seven days of either the expiration of the time for filing an appeal
of this Order or the conclusion of an appeal of this Order, whichever occurs later, Florida Power
& Light Company shall file an appropriately revised public version of Document No. 01692-
2026 with the Commission Clerk. It is further
ORDERED that this Order shall be the only notification by the Commission to the parties
of the date of declassification of the materials discussed herein.
ORDER NO. PSC-2026-0170-CFO-EI
DOCKET NO. 20260020-EI
PAGE 4
By ORDER of Commissioner Bobby Payne, as Prehearing Officer, this 27th
day of May, 2026.
BOBBY PAYNE
Commissioner and Prehearing Officer
Florida Public Service Commission
2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399
(850) 413-6770
www.floridapsc.com
Copies furnished: A copy of this document is
provided to the parties of record at the time of
issuance and, if applicable, interested persons.
CMM
NOTICE OF FURTHER PROCEEDINGS OR JUDICIAL REVIEW
The Florida Public Service Commission (Commission) is required by Section 120.569(1),
Florida Statutes, to notify parties of any administrative hearing or judicial review of Commission
orders that is available under Sections 120.57 or 120.68, Florida Statutes, as well as the
procedures and time limits that apply. This notice should not be construed to mean all requests
for an administrative hearing or judicial review will be granted or result in the relief sought.
Mediation may be available on a case-by-case basis. If mediation is conducted, it does
not affect a substantially interested person's right to a hearing.
Any party adversely affected by this order, which is preliminary, procedural, or
intermediate in nature, may request: (1) reconsideration within 10 days pursuant to Rule 25-
22.0376, Florida Administrative Code; or (2) judicial review by the Florida Supreme Court, in
the case of an electric, gas, or telephone utility. A motion for reconsideration shall be filed with
the 	Office 	of 	Commission 	Clerk, 	in 	the 	form 	prescribed 	by 	Rule 	25-22.0376, 	Florida
Administrative Code. Judicial review of a preliminary, procedural, or intermediate ruling or
order is available if review of the final action will not provide an adequate remedy. Such review
may be requested from the appropriate court, as described above, pursuant to Rule 9.100, Florida
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.