Ramon Ruiz v. Public Storage

CourtListener 10870078Fladistctapp04.06.2026

Gesamter Gesetzestext

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed June 4, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

Nos. 3D25-2585
Lower Tribunal No. 25-15347-CA-01
________________

Ramon Ruiz,
Appellant,

vs.

Public Storage, et al.,
Appellees.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Charles Kenneth Johnson, Judge.

Ramon Ruiz, in proper person.

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, and
Caroline A. Sand, for appellees.

Before LOGUE, GORDO and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610; Hamad v. Sarsour, 406 So. 3d

334, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (“Although a trial court is afforded broad

discretion, a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy which should

be granted only sparingly. A party seeking an injunction must demonstrate

that (1) irreparable injury will result if relief is not granted; (2) there is no

adequate remedy at law; (3) the party has a clear legal right to relief; and (4)

entry of an injunction serves the public interest. The moving party must

furnish competent, substantial evidence satisfying each prong.”) (internal

citations omitted); Yardley v. Albu, 826 So. 2d 467, 470 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)

(“Because the entering of a temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy,

strict compliance with the provisions of rule 1.610 is required.”).

2

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.