CourtListener 10864738•Manuel A. Menocal v. Mark Harrington, Etc.
Manuel A. Menocal v. Mark Harrington, Etc.
CourtListener 10864738Fladistctapp27.05.2026
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 27, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-2247
Lower Tribunal No. 25-2566-CP-02
________________
Manuel A. Menocal,
Appellant,
vs.
Mark Harrington, etc., et al.,
Appellees.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L.
Fernandez, Judge.
Manuel A. Menocal, in proper person.
Marlow, Adler, Abrams & Rotunno, and Philip Glatzer and Jose I.
Valdes, for appellees.
Before SCALES, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
On Confession Of Error
Appellant Manuel A. Menocal, pro se, appeals a July 3, 2025 order
granting the motion to dismiss of the predecessor personal representative of
the Estates of Anna Nikolic and Lieselotte Schnarr, thereby dismissing
Menocal’s amended complaint with prejudice. After the filing of Menocal’s
initial brief, appellee Mark Harrington, the current personal representative,
filed a confession of error with this Court suggesting that, in granting the
dismissal motion, the trial court considered material beyond the four corners
of Menocal’s amended complaint. We treat Harrington’s confession of error
as an answer brief and, without opining on whether the confession of error
contains a correct recitation of the law, we summarily reverse the challenged
order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(b) and remand
for further proceedings. All pending motions are denied as moot.
Reversed based on confession of error.
2
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.