2024-2238•Gary Leman, et al. v. Orit Tal
Gesamter Gesetzestext
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 31, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-2238 Lower Tribunal No. 22-31850-SP-05 ________________ Gary Leman, et al., Appellants, vs. Orit Tal, Appellee. An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana Gonzalez-Whyte, Judge. Solnick Law P.A., and Peter J. Solnick, for appellants. The Scharf Appellate Group, and Erik W. Scharf, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(a) (“To preserve for appeal a challenge to the failure of the trial court to make required findings of fact in
2 the final judgment, a party must raise that issue in a motion for rehearing under this rule.”); Schneider v. Tirikian, 397 So. 3d 1070, 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024) (“The key to preservation is whether the trial court had an opportunity to correct the purported error.”); Forte v. All Cnty. Towing Inc., 336 So. 3d 316, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2022) (“An award of attorney’s fees will be upheld on appeal so long as it is supported by competent, substantial evidence.”).
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.