RUSSELL S. GEORGE v. HARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, as successor in interest to Household Bank (SB), N.A.

2025-0855Fla Dist Ct App 6th

Gesamter Gesetzestext

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF F LORIDA
_____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-0855
Lower Tribunal No. 2009-SC-003470
_____________________________
RUSSELL S. G EORGE,
Appellant,
v.
H ARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, as successor in interest to H OUSEHOLD BANK
(SB), N.A.,
Appellee.
_____________________________
Appeal from the County Court for Lee County.
Tara P. Paluck and Devin S. George, Judges.
January 9, 2026
BROWNLEE, J.
Appellant Russell S. George appeals two orders entered in this small-claims
post-judgment action. As to that portion of the appeal challenging the trial court’s
order denying Appellant’s motion to vacate, we affirm. We find, however, that the
trial court’s order denying all pending motions is a nonfinal, non-appealable order.
Accordingly, we treat that portion of the appeal which challenges the order denying
all pending motions as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c)
2
(“If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause must be treated as if the proper
remedy had been sought . . . .”), and deny the petition on the merits.
AFFIRMED in part; DENIED in part.
STARGEL and NARDELLA, JJ., concur.
Russell S. George, Punta Gorda, pro se.
Ryan E. Sprechman, of Sprechman & Fisher, P.A., Miami, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING
AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.