2025-0855•RUSSELL S. GEORGE v. HARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, as successor in interest to Household Bank (SB), N.A.
RUSSELL S. GEORGE v. HARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, as successor in interest to Household Bank (SB), N.A.
2025-0855Fla Dist Ct App 6th
Gesamter Gesetzestext
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF F LORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2025-0855 Lower Tribunal No. 2009-SC-003470 _____________________________ RUSSELL S. G EORGE, Appellant, v. H ARVEST CREDIT MANAGEMENT VII, as successor in interest to H OUSEHOLD BANK (SB), N.A., Appellee. _____________________________ Appeal from the County Court for Lee County. Tara P. Paluck and Devin S. George, Judges. January 9, 2026 BROWNLEE, J. Appellant Russell S. George appeals two orders entered in this small-claims post-judgment action. As to that portion of the appeal challenging the trial court’s order denying Appellant’s motion to vacate, we affirm. We find, however, that the trial court’s order denying all pending motions is a nonfinal, non-appealable order. Accordingly, we treat that portion of the appeal which challenges the order denying all pending motions as a petition for writ of certiorari, see Fla. R. App. P. 9.040(c)
2 (“If a party seeks an improper remedy, the cause must be treated as if the proper remedy had been sought . . . .”), and deny the petition on the merits. AFFIRMED in part; DENIED in part. STARGEL and NARDELLA, JJ., concur. Russell S. George, Punta Gorda, pro se. Ryan E. Sprechman, of Sprechman & Fisher, P.A., Miami, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.