Kevin O. Porter and Lorna Porter v. U.S. Bank National Association

2025-1622Fladistctapp4

Gesamter Gesetzestext

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
KEVIN O. PORTER and LORNA PORTER,
Appellants,
v.
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
SECURITZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC TURST 2006-
NC2M MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-
NC2,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1622
[April 1, 2026]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward 	County; 	Mark 	Alan 	Speiser, 	Senior 	Judge; 	L.T. 	Case 	No.
CACE18017205.
Kevin O. Porter and Lorna Porter, Miramar, pro se.
Shawn Lee Taylor of DeLuca Law Group, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
P ER CURIAM .
Affirmed. 	See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the
appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so
as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the
evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context,
neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so
misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
KLINGENSMITH, S HAW and LOTT , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

KEVIN O. PORTER and LORNA PORTER,
Appellants,

Vv.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR
SECURITZED ASSET BACKED RECEIVABLES LLC TURST 2006-
NC2M MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-
NC2,

Appellee.

No. 4D2025-1622
[April 1, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Mark Alan Speiser, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No.
CACE18017205.

Kevin O. Porter and Lorna Porter, Miramar, pro se.
Shawn Lee Taylor of DeLuca Law Group, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d
1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the
appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so
as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the
evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context,
neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so
misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).

KLINGENSMITH, SHAW and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.