Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander v. Jose Leonardo Peralta

2026-0240Fladistctapp4

Originalquelle öffnen

Gesamter Gesetzestext

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
GRISELDA DOMINGA EVELYN SANTANDER,
Appellant,
v.
JOSE LEONARDO PERALTA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2026-0240
[February 25, 2026]
Nonfinal 	appeal 	from 	the 	Circuit 	Court 	for 	the 	Fifteenth 	Judicial
Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl Annette Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case
No. 502020DR003221XXXXMB.
Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander, Marysville, Washington, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM .
We summarily affirm the order temporarily modifying timesharing.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion.
Riddle v. Riddle, 214 So. 3d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Temporary
relief orders in family law cases are among the areas where trial judges
have 	the 	very 	broadest 	discretion, 	which 	appellate 	courts 	are 	very
reluctant 	to 	interfere 	with 	except 	under 	the 	most 	compelling 	of
circumstances.”).
Affirmed.
KUNTZ , C.J., M AY and GERBER , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

GRISELDA DOMINGA EVELYN SANTANDER,
Appellant,

Vv.

JOSE LEONARDO PERALTA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2026-0240
[February 25, 2026]

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial
Circuit, Palm Beach County; Cheryl Annette Caracuzzo, Judge; L.T. Case
No. 502020DR00322 1XXXXMB.

Griselda Dominga Evelyn Santander, Marysville, Washington, pro se.
No appearance for appellee.
PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the order temporarily modifying timesharing.
Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a). The trial court did not abuse its broad discretion.
Riddle v. Riddle, 214 So. 3d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (“Temporary
relief orders in family law cases are among the areas where trial judges
have the very broadest discretion, which appellate courts are very

reluctant to interfere with except under the most compelling of
circumstances.”).

Affirmed.

KUNTZ, C.J., MAY and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.