Colandro Dewayne Peters v. State of Florida

2025-2476Fladistctapp4

Originalquelle öffnen

Gesamter Gesetzestext

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
COLANDRO DEWAYNE PETERS,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D2025-2476
[December 10, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 2022-CF-001726 A.
Colandro Dewayne Peters, Cross City, pro se.
James 	Uthmeier, 	Attorney 	General, 	Tallahassee, 	and 	Lindsay 	A.
Warner, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM .
We reverse and remand the order denying the pro se motion to correct
sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).
The pro se motion was unauthorized as petitioner was and remains
represented by counsel in his pending direct appeal. 	Coffelt v. State, 905
So. 2d 269, 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). The trial court shall strike the pro se
motion as unauthorized. 	Id.
Reversed and remand with instructions.
MAY , CONNER and K LINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

COLANDRO DEWAYNE PETERS,
Appellant,

Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-2476
[December 10, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for
the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman,
Judge; L.T. Case No. 2022-CF-001726 A.

Colandro Dewayne Peters, Cross City, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lindsay A.
Warner, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the order denying the pro se motion to correct
sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2).
The pro se motion was unauthorized as petitioner was and remains
represented by counsel in his pending direct appeal. Coffelt v. State, 905
So. 2d 269, 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). The trial court shall strike the pro se
motion as unauthorized. Id.

Reversed and remand with instructions.

MAY, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.