Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees v. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Foundation, Inc.

2022-0313Fladistctapp4

Gesamter Gesetzestext

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION,
INC.,
Appellee/Cross-Appellant.
No. 4D2022-0313
[February 4, 2026]
Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Elizabeth A. Metzger, Judge; L.T. Case
No. 2017CA000508.
Andy Bardos and Ashley H. Lukis of GrayRobinson, P.A., Tallahassee,
and Jack R. Reiter of GrayRobinson, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Stuart H. Singer, Sashi C. Bach, and Jesse Panuccio of Boies Schiller
Flexner LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Joseph G. Galardi, Scott W. Atherton,
and Alaina B. Karsten of Atherton Galardi Mullen & Reeder PLLC, West
Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
PER CURIAM .
This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida.
In 	Florida 	Atlantic 	University 	Board 	of 	Trustees 	v. 	Harbor 	Branch
Oceanographic Institute Foundation, Inc., 372 So. 3d 302 (Fla. 4th DCA
2023), we addressed an appeal and cross-appeal that involved contract
impairment arguments. 	We affirmed the trial court’s determinations that
(1) a statute governing direct-support organizations unconstitutionally
impaired the appellee’s contractual right to make all but two appointments
to its board, and (2) Florida Board of Governors Regulation 9.011 did not
impair the contract with respect to budget approval.
The supreme court affirmed our holding as to the budget approval
issue, 	but 	disagreed 	with 	our 	decision 	on 	the 	board 	member
2
appointment/approval 	issue, 	holding 	no 	contract 	impairment 	had
occurred, but even if it had occurred, it was constitutionally permissible.
See Fla. Atl. Univ. Bd. of Trs. v. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Inst. Found.,
Inc., No. SC2023-1470, 2025 WL 3481621 (Fla. Dec. 4, 2025).
Pursuant to the supreme court’s opinion, we again affirm the judgment
for Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees on the appellee’s cross-
appeal and reverse the trial court’s judgment in favor of the Harbor Branch
Oceanographic 	Institute 	Foundation, 	Inc., 	on 	the 	appellant’s 	direct
appeal. We remand for the trial court to enter a final judgment consistent
with the supreme court’s decision.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
M AY , CIKLIN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
No motion for rehearing shall be considered.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

Vv.

HARBOR BRANCH OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTE FOUNDATION,
INC.,
Appellee /Cross-Appellant.

No. 4D2022-0313
[February 4, 2026]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth
Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Elizabeth A. Metzger, Judge; L.T. Case
No. 2017CA000508.

Andy Bardos and Ashley H. Lukis of GrayRobinson, P.A., Tallahassee,
and Jack R. Reiter of GrayRobinson, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Stuart H. Singer, Sashi C. Bach, and Jesse Panuccio of Boies Schiller
Flexner LLP, Fort Lauderdale, and Joseph G. Galardi, Scott W. Atherton,
and Alaina B. Karsten of Atherton Galardi Mullen & Reeder PLLC, West
Palm Beach, for appellee.

ON REMAND FROM THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT
PER CURIAM.

This matter is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of Florida.
In Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees v. Harbor Branch
Oceanographic Institute Foundation, Inc., 372 So. 3d 302 (Fla. 4th DCA
2023), we addressed an appeal and cross-appeal that involved contract
impairment arguments. We affirmed the trial court’s determinations that
(1) a statute governing direct-support organizations unconstitutionally
impaired the appellee’s contractual right to make all but two appointments
to its board, and (2) Florida Board of Governors Regulation 9.011 did not
impair the contract with respect to budget approval.

The supreme court affirmed our holding as to the budget approval
issue, but disagreed with our decision on the board member

appointment/approval issue, holding no contract impairment had
occurred, but even if it had occurred, it was constitutionally permissible.
See Fla. Atl. Univ. Bd. of Trs. v. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Inst. Found.,
Inc., No. SC2023-1470, 2025 WL 3481621 (Fla. Dec. 4, 2025).

Pursuant to the supreme court’s opinion, we again affirm the judgment
for Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees on the appellee’s cross-
appeal and reverse the trial court’s judgment in favor of the Harbor Branch
Oceanographic Institute Foundation, Inc., on the appellant’s direct
appeal. We remand for the trial court to enter a final judgment consistent
with the supreme court’s decision.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
May, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

No motion for rehearing shall be considered.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.