Teneca Hines v. Deborah Gill

2025-1367Fladistctapp1

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
S TATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2025-1367
_____________________________
T ENECA H INES,
Appellant,
v.
DEBORAH GILL ,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Kerra Smith, Judge.
March 18, 2026
P ER C URIAM.
Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court’s Order
dated January 29, 	2026, and present an adequate record for
review, 	we 	must 	affirm. 	See 	Applegate 	v. 	Barnett 	Bank 	of
Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record
of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly
resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial
court’s 	judgment 	is 	not 	supported 	by 	the 	evidence 	or 	by 	an
alternative theory.”).
A FFIRMED.
B ILBREY , NORDBY, and TREADWELL , JJ., concur.
2
_____________________________
Not 	final 	until 	disposition 	of 	any 	timely 	and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.
Deborah Gill, pro se, Appellee.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-1367

TENECA HINES,
Appellant,
v.

DEBORAH GILL,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.
Kerra Smith, Judge.

March 18, 2026
PER CURIAM.

Because Appellant failed to comply with this Court’s Order
dated January 29, 2026, and present an adequate record for
review, we must affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of
Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1052 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record
of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly
resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial
court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an
alternative theory.”).

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, NORDBY, and TREADWELL, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.

Teneca Hines, pro se, Appellant.

Deborah Gill, pro se, Appellee.

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.