2025-1381•Sehman v. Sehman
Gesamter Gesetzestext
FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2025-1381 _____________________________ Y ENTE LEEANN SEHMAN , Petitioner, v. C HRISTOPHER SCOTT SEHMAN , Respondent. _____________________________ Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. January 14, 2026 P ER C URIAM. DISMISSED. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that because Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the matter had been called up for hearing and disposition, Petitioner had failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief). R OWE , B ILBREY , and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur.
2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Yente Leeann Sehman, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D2025-1381 YENTE LEEANN SEHMAN, Petitioner, Vv. CHRISTOPHER SCOTT SEHMAN, Respondent. Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction. January 14, 2026 PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. lst DCA 2017) (holding that because Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the matter had been called up for hearing and disposition, Petitioner had failed to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief). ROWE, BILBREY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Yente Leeann Sehman, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.