2024-2439•Mary J. Gordon-Durant v. Delandras R. Durant
Gesamter Gesetzestext
FIFTH D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-2439 L.T. Case No. 2023-DR-000592 _____________________________ M ARY J. GORDON -D URANT , Appellant, v. DELANDRAS R. DURANT , Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Dan F. Briggs, Judge. Kene H. Anusionwu, Windermere, for Appellant. Scott A. Livingston, Livingston Litigation, PLLC, Winter Springs, for Appellee. November 18, 2025 PER C URIAM. A FFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error. . . . Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); Fortune v. Pantin, 851 So. 2d 274, 275 (Fla.
2 5th DCA 2003) (explaining that appellate review in the absence of a trial transcript is “limited to errors of law that are apparent on the face of the judgment”). JAY , C.J., and H ARRIS and MAC I VER , JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. 5D2024-2439 L.T. Case No. 2023-DR-000592 Mary J. GORDON-DURANT, Appellant, v. DELANDRAS R. DURANT, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County, Dan F. Briggs, Judge. Kene H. Anusionwu, Windermere, for Appellant. Scott A. Livingston, Livingston Litigation, PLLC, Winter Springs, for Appellee. November 18, 2025 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“In appellate proceedings the decision of a trial court has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error. ... Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); Fortune v. Pantin, 851 So. 2d 274, 275 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (explaining that appellate review in the absence of a trial transcript is “limited to errors of law that are apparent on the face of the judgment’). JAY, C.J., and HARRIS and MACIVER, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.