2024-1505•Tyrone Warren v. State of Florida
Gesamter Gesetzestext
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D2024-1505 LT Case No. 2021-CF-1111 _____________________________ TYRONE WARREN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Lake County. Cary F. Rada, Judge. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Judson Searcy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. December 5, 2025 PER CURIAM. In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. We remand only for correction of scrivener’s errors in the written sentence. 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2 Below, Appellant moved to correct sentencing errors pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), arguing his written Judgment and Sentence and Final Judgment Assessing Charges, Costs, and Fines each included a $250 fine and $12.50 surcharge on count 1 that was not orally pronounced at sentencing. The trial court entered an order striking the fine and surcharge and rendered a Second Amended Final Judgment Assessing Charges, Costs, and Fines in which the fine and surcharge were stricken. However, the trial court failed to also amend Appellant’s Judgment and Sentence to remove the fine and surcharge. We cannot conclude that this error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, we remand for entry of amended sentencing documents striking the discretionary $250 fine and surcharge in accordance with the lower court’s ruling on Appellant’s motion and consistent with the Second Amended Final Judgment Assessing Charges, Costs, and Fines. See Johnson v. State, 354 So. 3d 598, 600 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022). AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions. EISNAUGLE and KILBANE, JJ., concur. EDWARDS, J., concurs in result only.
3 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Was bedeutet dieser Text für Ihre Situation?
Kostenlose und unverbindliche Beratung
Schildern Sie uns Ihre Situation. Unser Team meldet sich per E-Mail bei Ihnen für Ihre Beratung.
Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.