E-L-H- ET AL.

Interim Decision #3345
In re E-L-H- et al., Respondents
Decided January 30, 1998
U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Office for Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals
Precedent decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals which have been certi-
fied to the Attorney General for review are binding on the Immigration and Naturalization
Service and the Immigration Judges and continue to serve as precedent in all proceedings
involving the same issue or issues unless or until they are modified or overruled by the Board
or the Attorney General.
Pro se
Scott M. Rosen, Appellate Counsel, for the Immigration and Naturalization Service
Before: 	Board Panel: DUNNE, Vice Chairman; VACCA and VILLAGELIU, Board
Members.
DUNNE, Vice Chairman:
The Immigration and Naturalization Service has filed a motion to
reconsider our ruling of August 29, 1997, which reversed the Immigration
Judge’s decision to deny the respondents asylum and withholding of depor-
tation under sections 208 and 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 and 1253(h)(1994). We have jurisdiction over this
matter pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a)(1997). The motion will be denied.
The Service argued in its motion that the Board’s reliance on Matter of
C-Y-Z-, 21 I&N Dec. 915 (BIA 1997), in our August 29, 1997, decision was
improper. It contends that because Matter of C-Y-Z- has been certified to the
Attorney General, the Board should not have relied on it as a precedent in
deciding the instant case. The Service cited Matter of Farias, 21 I&N Dec.
269 (BIA 1996, 1997; A.G. 1997), for the proposition that a decision of the
Board is not final while it is under Attorney General review.
We have carefully considered the arguments and authority cited by the
Service. We agree with the Service that Board decisions are final except in
those cases reviewed by the Attorney General. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 3.1(d)(2),
(h)(1997), However, “[e]xcept as they may be modified or overruled by the
Board or the Attorney General, decisions of the Board shall be binding on
all officers and employees of the Service or Immigration Judges in the
administration of the Act, and selected decisions designated by the Board
shall serve as precedents in all proceedings involving the same issue or
issues.” 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(g).
21

Interim Decision #3345
We find that although Matter of C-Y-Z-, supra, has been certified to the
Attorney General for review, the decision remains binding unless or until it
is modified or overruled by the Board or the Attorney General. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 3.1(g), We therefore conclude that our reliance on Matter of C-Y-Z- was
proper.
Accordingly, the Service’s motion will be denied.
ORDER: The motion to reconsider is denied.
22