Retained Realty, Inc. v. Selke

************************************************
The “officially released” date that appears near the
beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be
published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it
is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the
beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin-
ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi-
cially released” date appearing in the opinion.
All opinions are subject to modification and technical
correction prior to official publication in the Connecti-
cut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut
Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event
of discrepancies between the advance release version of
an opinion and the version appearing in the Connecti-
cut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut
Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest
version is to be considered authoritative.
The syllabus and procedural history accompanying
an opinion that appear in the Connecticut Law Jour-
nal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or
Connecticut Appellate Reports are copyrighted by the
Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may
not be reproduced or distributed without the express
written permission of the Commission on Official Legal
Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut.
************************************************
Page 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0

2 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1
Retained Realty, Inc. v. Selke

RETAINED REALTY, INC. v. CHRISTOPHER
A. SELKE ET AL.
(AC 47040)
Elgo, Suarez and DiPentima, Js.

Syllabus

The defendant property owner appealed from the judgment of foreclosure
by sale rendered by the trial court for the plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure
action. Held:

This court dismissed the defendant’s appeal as moot because, after the trial
court had terminated the appellate stay, it approved the committee’s sale
of the defendant’s property, which extinguished his right of redemption and,
thereafter, title to the property vested in the successful bidder.

Submitted on briefs September 17—officially released
November 5, 2024

Procedural History

Action to foreclose a mortgage on certain real prop-
erty owned by the named defendant, and for other relief,
brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of
Stamford-Norwalk, where the named defendant et al.
were defaulted for failure to plead; thereafter, the defen-
dant Point Digital Finance, Inc., was defaulted for fail-
ure to disclose a defense; subsequently, the court, Hon.
Robert L. Genuario, judge trial referee, granted the
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; thereafter, the
court, Hon. Robert L. Genuario, judge trial referee,
granted the plaintiff’s motion for a judgment of foreclo-
sure by sale and rendered judgment thereon, from
which the named defendant appealed to this court; sub-
sequently, the court, Hon. Robert L. Genuario, judge
trial referee, granted the plaintiff’s motion for termina-
tion of the stay of execution; thereafter, the court, Hon.
Kevin Tierney, judge trial referee, granted the plaintiff’s
motion for approval of the committee sale; subse-
quently, the court, Hon. John F. Kavanewsky, Jr., judge
trial referee, granted the motion to open filed by the
0, 0 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 1

0 Conn. App. 1 ,0 3
Retained Realty, Inc. v. Selke

defendant Bay Tree Lane I, LLC, solely to substitute
Point Titling Trust as a party defendant. Appeal dis-
missed.

Christopher A. Selke, self-represented, filed a brief
as the appellant (named defendant).

Taryn D. Martin filed a brief for the appellee (plain-
tiff).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. On September 17, 2024, this court
ordered that the parties, the plaintiff, Retained Realty,
Inc., and the defendant Christopher A. Selke,1 file sup-
plemental memoranda addressing whether the defen-
dant’s appeal from the trial court’s judgment of foreclo-
sure by sale of the defendant’s property should be
dismissed as moot where, after the trial court termi-
nated the appellate stay, it approved the committee’s
sale of the property on April 5, 2024, which extinguished
the defendant’s right of redemption, and, thereafter,
title to the property vested in the successful bidder.
See U.S. Bank, National Assn. v. Fitzpatrick, 206 Conn.
App. 509, 514–15, 260 A.3d 1240 (2021); Connecticut
Savings Bank v. Howes, 9 Conn. App. 446, 447–48, 519
A.2d 1216 (1987). Neither party filed a response to this
order. After a careful review of the record, briefs, and
appendices on file, we have determined that this appeal
is moot. See, e.g., BNY Western Trust v. Roman, 102
Conn. App. 265, 266–67, 926 A.2d 36 (after sale is
1
The complaint named Park Tower Stamford Association, Inc., Point
Digital Finance, Inc., and Bay Tree Lane I, LLC, as additional defendants.
The trial court defaulted Park Tower Stamford Association, Inc., and Bay
Tree Lane I, LLC, for failure to plead and Point Digital Finance, Inc., for
failure to disclose a defense. Thereafter, the court substituted Point Titling
Trust as a party defendant for Bay Tree Lane I, LLC. None of these entities
has participated in this appeal. Accordingly, all references in this opinion
to the defendant are to Selke alone.
Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL 0, 0

4 ,0 0 Conn. App. 1
Retained Realty, Inc. v. Selke

approved and relevant appeal periods have expired, any
action by mortgagor to redeem should be dismissed as
moot), cert. denied, 284 Conn. 935, 937 A.2d 693 (2007).
The appeal is dismissed.