Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
20-56254•Paulette Smith, individually and as Successor in Interest to Albert Dorsey, deceased v. Edward Agdeppa, an individual
20-56254Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit01.03.2024
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAULETTE SMITH, individually and
as Successor in Interest to Albert
Dorsey, deceased,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual,
Defendant-Appellant,
and
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a
municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10,
Defendants.
No. 20-56254
D.C. No.
2:19-cv-05370-
CAS-JC
ORDER
Filed March 1, 2024
Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and
Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges.
Order
-- 1 of 2 --
2 SMITH V. AGDEPPA
ORDER
Judge Callahan and Judge Bress voted to deny the
petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Christen voted to grant
the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised
of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a
vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter
failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused
active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App.
P. 35(a). Appellee’s petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 65,
is DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.