Lydia Olson v. State of California

21-55757Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18.12.2023

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LYDIA OLSON; MIGUEL PEREZ;
POSTMATES, INC., (Successor Postmates
LLC); UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA; ROB BONTA,
in his capacity as Attorney General of the
State of California,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 21-55757
D.C. No.
2:19-cv-10956-DMG-RAO
Central District of California,
Los Angeles
ORDER
MURGUIA, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that
this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)
and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.
FILED
DEC 18 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 1 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.