Freddy Curiel v. AMY MILLER, Warden

11-56949Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit25.08.2015

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FREDDY CURIEL,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
AMY MILLER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 11-56949
D.C. No.
8:10-cv-00301-DDP-FMO
ORDER
Filed August 25, 2015
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or
vote in this case.

-- 1 of 1 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.