Cgi Technologies v. Rhonda Rose; Nelson Langer Engle Pllc

11-35127Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16.08.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS
INC., in its capacity as sponsor and
fiduciary for CGI Technologies and
Solutions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER
ENGLE PLLC,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 11-35127
D.C. No.
2:10-cv-00298-
RSM
CGI TECHNOLOGIES AND SOLUTIONS
INC., in its capacity as sponsor and
fiduciary for CGI Technologies and
Solutions, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RHONDA ROSE; NELSON LANGER
ENGLE PLLC,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-35128
D.C. No.
2:10-cv-00298-
RSM
ORDER

-- 1 of 2 --

CGI TECH. AND SOLUTIONS, INC. V. ROSE 2
The Honorable Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge for the U.S. *
District Court for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed August 16, 2013
Before: Mary M. Schroeder and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit
Judges, and Ralph R. Beistline, Chief District Judge.*
ORDER
We vacate the district court’s order and remand this case
to the district court for further proceedings consistent with US
Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 133 S. Ct. 1537, 569 U.S.___
(2013).

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.