MARTIK SARGSYAN and KRISTINE SARGSYAN v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General

08-72040Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit09.05.2013

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTIK SARGSYAN and KRISTINE
SARGSYAN,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72040
Agency Nos.
A078-249-396
A078-364-947
ORDER
Filed May 9, 2013
Before: Jerome Farris, John T. Noonan, and
Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The motion for attorney’s fee is DENIED. The
government’s position was substantially justified.
NOONAN, Circuit Judge, concurring:
I concur because the statute is clear. I regret the result.
An able and experienced lawyer who devoted substantial time
to aid persons threatened with deportation is denied

-- 1 of 2 --

SARGSYAN V. HOLDER 2
remuneration for her services. At the very least, we should be
able to postpone a decision on the fees until the conclusion of
the case. The EAJA does not work well when it compels a
court to cut off compensation of careful and effective
advocacy.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.