Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
- Rechtsrecherche mit Zugriff auf über 1 Million Quellen
- Dokumentenautomatisierung
- Mandatsverwaltung
- Gehostet in der EU und der Schweiz
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
Der KI-Arbeitsbereich für Juristen
14 Tage kostenlos testen (10 Fragen/Tag während der Testphase)
09-55239•George Robert Huff v. City of Burbank, a municipal D.C. No.corporation
09-55239Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19.04.2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE ROBERT HUFF; MARIA
HUFF; V.R.H., by and through his
Guardian Ad Litem George Robert
Huff,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. No. 09-55239
CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal D.C. No.corporation; DARIN RYBURN, as an 2:07-cv-04114- individual and in his official FMC-AJWcapacity; EDMUNDO ZEPEDA, as an
individual and in his official ORDER
capacity; CHRIS ROBARTS, as an
individual and in his official
capacity; FERNANDO MUNOZ, as an
individual and in his official
capacity,
Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed April 19, 2012
Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Circuit Judge,
Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Circuit Judge, and
Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge.*
*The Honorable Algenon L. Marbley, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.
4287
-- 1 of 2 --
ORDER
We remand to the district court to comply with the United
States Supreme Court’s decision in Ryburn v. Huff, 132 S. Ct.
987 (2012).
The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R. App. P.
41(b).
4288 HUFF v. CITY OF BURBANK
-- 2 of 2 --
Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.