United States v. 2009-04-09 | 05-56023 | LINKLINE V. SBC CALIFORNIA, INC. | precedential | opinion |

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.;
INREACH INTERNET LLC; OM
NETWORKS, dba Omsoft
Technologies, Inc.; NITELOG, INC.,
dba Red Shift Internet Services, No. 05-56023
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No.
v. CV-03-05265-SVW
SBC CALIFORNIA, INC., fka Pacific ORDER
Bell Telephone Company; PACIFIC
BELL INTERNET SERVICES; SBC
ADVANCED SOLUTIONS, INC.,
Defendants-Appellants. 
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed April 9, 2009
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and
Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Pacific Bell
Telephone Co. v. Linkline Communications, Inc., ___ U.S.
___, 129 S. Ct. 1109 (2009), we vacate our prior opinion in
LinkLine Communications, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503
F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2007) and remand to the district court for
proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court decision,
4161

-- 1 of 4 --

including but not limited to, its consideration of proposed
amendments to the complaint.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
REMANDED.
4162 LINKLINE COMMUNICATIONS v. SBC CALIFORNIA

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

-- 4 of 4 --