Mitchell Barnes-Wallace; Maxwell Breen v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, D.C. No.Defendant, CV-00-01726- NAJ/AJB

04-55732Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit11.06.2008

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE;
MAXWELL BREEN,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v. No. 04-55732
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, D.C. No.Defendant, CV-00-01726-
NAJ/AJB and
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - DESERT
PACIFIC COUNCIL,
Defendant-Appellant. 
 MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE;
MAXWELL BREEN; LORI BARNES-
WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem;
LYNN BARNES-WALLACE, Guardian
Ad Litem; MICHAEL BREEN, No. 04-56167
Guardian Ad Litem; VALERIE D.C. No.
BREEN, Guardian Ad Litem, CV-00-01726- Plaintiffs-Appellants, NAJ/AJB
v. ORDER
CITY OF SAN DIEGO; BOY SCOUTS OF
AMERICA - DESERT PACIFIC
COUNCIL,
Defendants-Appellees. 
Filed June 11, 2008
Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and
Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
6625

-- 1 of 4 --

ORDER
The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is
GRANTED. The certification order filed in this case on
December 18, 2006, is withdrawn. A new certification order
with accompanying concurrence and dissent is filed contem-
poraneously with the filing of this order. Subsequent petitions
for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.
The pending petition of defendants-appellees for rehearing
en banc is dismissed as moot. No other petitions for panel or
en banc hearing have been filed.
6626 BARNES-WALLACE v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

-- 4 of 4 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.