United States v. 2007-04-06 | 04-15788 | ALDF VVENEMAN | precedential | opinion |

04-15788Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit06.04.2007

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND;
ANIMAL WELFARE INSTITUTE;
VALERIE BUCHANAN; JANE
GARRISON; NANCY MEGNA,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 04-15788
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR D.C. No.
 BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, CV-03-03400-PJH
Intervenor-Appellee, ORDER
v.
ANN M. VENEMAN; BOBBY R.
ACORD; CHESTER A. GIPSON,
Defendants-Appellees. 
Filed April 6, 2007
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active
judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by
the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-
judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to
this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to
the extent adopted by the en banc court.
4115

-- 1 of 2 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2007 Thomson/West.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.