United States v. 2006-01-26 | 04-30393 | USA VLADWIG | precedential | opinion |

04-30393Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26.01.2006

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 04-30393
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
v. CR-03-00232-RHW
Eastern District  CRAIG ALLEN LADWIG, of Washington,Defendant-Appellant. Spokane
ORDER

Filed January 27, 2006
Before: Ronald M. Gould and Marsha S. Berzon,
Circuit Judges, and William W Schwarzer,* District Judge.
ORDER
In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdic-
tion and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing
on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under
United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en
banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not
seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were
resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Ladwig’s
sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the
time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehear-
ing En Banc has expired.
*The Honorable William W Schwarzer, Senior United States District
Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.
1179

-- 1 of 2 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2006 Thomson/West.

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.