United States v. 2005-08-31 | 03-30281 | USA VLEWIS | precedential | opinion |

03-30281Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit31.08.2005

Gesamter Gesetzestext

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-30281
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No.
v. CR-01-00149-A-  JWSDANIEL CARSON LEWIS,
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed September 1, 2005
Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and
Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Hall
COUNSEL
Teresa S. Ridle and Rebecca S. Copeland, Patton Boggs, LLP,
Anchorage, Alaska, for the defendant-appellant.
12077

-- 1 of 2 --

Karen Loeffler, Assistant United States Attorney, Anchorage,
Alaska, for the plaintiff-appellee.
OPINION
HALL, Senior Circuit Judge:
We considered this case in July of 2004 and we affirmed
the convictions and the sentence. United States v. Lewis, No.
03-30281, 111 Fed.Appx. 876 (9th Cir. Sept. 24, 2004). The
Supreme Court granted certiorari, and vacated the decision
and remanded the case to us in light of United States v.
Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). Lewis v. United States, 125
S.Ct. 1404 (2005). Because Petitioner did not challenge his
sentence on Sixth Amendment grounds in the district court,
we grant a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ame-
line, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). See United
States v. Moreno-Hernandez, No. 03-30387, 2005 WL
1964483, at *8 (9th Cir. August 17, 2005) (holding that “de-
fendants are entitled to limited remands in all pending direct
criminal appeals involving unpreserved Booker error, whether
constitutional or nonconstitutional.”).
REMANDED.
12078 UNITED STATES v. LEWIS

-- 2 of 2 --

Setzen Sie Ihre Recherche in ChatGPT oder Claude fort

Verbinden Sie Omnilex, um den Rechtskorpus über Ihren KI-Assistenten zu durchsuchen.