United States of America v. Jonathan Lee Oliver

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
JONATHAN LEE OLIVER,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 23-30010
D.C. No. 9:13-cr-00034-DWM-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2023**
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Jonathan Lee Oliver appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking
supervised release and imposing a sentence of 45 days, plus 32 months of
supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Oliver’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
* The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUL 10 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 23-30010
with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --