Michael David Storman v. Alta Regional Center

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL DAVID STORMAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ALTA REGIONAL CENTER,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 22-15860
D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00907-KJM-CKD
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 17, 2023**
Before: CLIFTON, R. NELSON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Michael David Storman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing without prejudice his action alleging federal age and disability
discrimination claims. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.
We lack jurisdiction to review the dismissal because Storman voluntarily
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 20 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 22-15860
dismissed his action without prejudice. See Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1507
(9th Cir. 1995) (“A voluntary dismissal without prejudice is ordinarily not a final
judgment from which the plaintiff may appeal.”); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v.
Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1135 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (jurisdiction must be raised
sua sponte).
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --