BRUCE WANZO, Jr. v. CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRUCE WANZO, Jr.,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 20-56072
D.C. No.
2:19-cv-05764-JLS-SP
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 30, 2023**
San Francisco, California
Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Bruce Wanzo, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing his
petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that it was untimely pursuant to
the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U.S.C.
FILED
APR 3 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

§ 2244(d)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we
affirm.
Wanzo does not contest the district court’s dismissal of his claims
challenging his 1990 conviction as untimely and has therefore forfeited any
objection to the dismissal of those claims. See Miller v. Fairchild Indus., Inc., 797
F.2d 727, 738 (9th Cir. 1986).
Wanzo failed to raise any constitutional challenge to the Los Angeles
County Superior Court’s 2019 denial of his request for resentencing under former
section 1170.95 of the California Penal Code1 in his federal habeas petition. Nor
did he raise any such challenge in response to a show cause order of the magistrate
judge, in his objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, or in
his motion for a Certificate of Appealability (COA). Therefore, Wanzo has
forfeited any such challenge, and we affirm on that basis. See White v. Klitzkie,
281 F.3d 920, 921–22 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny as moot Wanzo’s motion for
judicial notice of his state court records, Dkt 25.
AFFIRMED.
1 The statute was renumbered as section 1172.6 of the California Penal
Code.
2

-- 2 of 2 --