David Wit; v. United Behavioral Health

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID WIT; et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
LINDA TILLITT; MARY JONES,
Intervenor-Plaintiffs-
Appellees,
v.
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH,
Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 20-17363
21-15193
D.C. No. 3:14-cv-02346-JCS
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
GARY ALEXANDER, on his own behalf
and on behalf of his beneficiary son, Jordan
Alexander; et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
MICHAEL DRISCOLL,
Intervenor-Plaintiff-
Appellee,
v.
UNITED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH,
Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 20-17364
21-15194
D.C. No. 3:14-cv-05337-JCS
FILED
JAN 26 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Before: CHRISTEN and FORREST, Circuit Judges, and ANELLO,* District
Judge.
The memorandum disposition filed on March 22, 2022, is withdrawn and
replaced with the concurrently filed opinion. The pending petition for panel
rehearing and rehearing en banc [97], and amicus curiae motions [101, 105, & 112]
are DENIED as moot. The court permits the parties to file subsequent petitions for
panel rehearing and rehearing en banc.
* The Honorable Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

-- 2 of 2 --