In re: PRAVEEN KHURANA v. STATE OF IDAHO, Child Support Services

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: PRAVEEN KHURANA,
Debtor,
______________________________
PRAVEEN KHURANA,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF IDAHO, Child Support Services,
Appellee.
No. 20-35054
D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00117-RHW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 8, 2022**
Before: WALLACE, TALLMAN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Praveen Khurana appeals pro se from the district court’s order affirming the
bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his adversary proceeding. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
DEC 14 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 20-35054
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We affirm.
In his opening brief, Khurana failed to address how the district court or
bankruptcy court erred and has therefore waived his challenge to the dismissal of
his adversary proceeding. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d
925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that “we will not consider any claims that
were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief”); Greenwood v. FAA, 28
F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (noting that “[w]e will not manufacture arguments
for an appellant . . . .”).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --