Rodrigo Carmona Carrera v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RODRIGO CARMONA CARRERA,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 21-70985
Agency No. A087-913-647
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 12, 2022**
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Rodrigo Carmona Carrera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUL 20 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 21-70985
Bhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny the petition for
review.
Carmona Carrera’s contention that jurisdiction did not vest with the
immigration court due to the missing information in his Notice to Appear (“NTA”)
is foreclosed by United States v. Bastide-Hernandez, No. 19-30006, 2022 WL
2662044, *2 *6 (9th Cir. July 11, 2022) (en banc), where the court held that a lack
of hearing information in the NTA does not deprive the immigration court of
subject matter jurisdiction, and 8 C.F.R. § 1003.14(a) is satisfied when later notice
provides hearing information. See also Karingithi v. Whitaker, 913 F.3d 1158,
1160-62 (9th Cir. 2019).
The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the
mandate.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --