United States v. 2020-08-10 | 20-10037 | USA V. EDGAR RAMIREZ-MARTINEZ | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

EDGAR RAMIREZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 20-10037
20-10038

D.C. Nos.
4:19-cr-50149-JAS-BGM-1
4:19-cr-01926-JAS-BGM-1

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
James A. Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020
**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Edgar Ramirez-Martinez appeals from his
guilty-plea conviction and 54-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the revocation of supervised release and partially
concurrent 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

AUG 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 20-10037 & 20-10038
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez-Martinez’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as
counsel of record. We have provided Ramirez-Martinez the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.